Scoring Methodology
TurboAudit analyzes every page across 7 dimensions using specialized agents. Each weighted dimension rolls up into a single 0-10 overall score.
Score Interpretation
8.0+
Pass — search-ready
5.0–7.9
Needs work
< 5.0
Critical issues
The 7 Audit Branches
Indexability
15%Can search engines and AI crawlers access and parse your page? We check robots.txt, canonical tags, HTTP status codes, JavaScript rendering, hreflang, redirects, HTTPS, and URL structure.
Snippet & CTR
12%Does your page present itself well in search results? We evaluate title tags (including rewrite risk detection), meta descriptions, H1 tags, Open Graph tags, Twitter cards, favicon, breadcrumb schema, and date display.
Intent & Value
20%Is the content genuinely useful? We assess product definitions, pricing visibility, comparison data, FAQ coverage, content depth, readability, boilerplate ratio, and the critical first 50 words.
Trust & E-E-A-T
18%Can search engines and AI verify your credibility? 43 rules checking author attribution, credentials, publication dates, about page, contact info, privacy policy, disclaimers, YMYL safeguards, and social proof signals.
Schema
10%Is your page machine-readable? 60 rules validating JSON-LD implementation — deeper than Google's own validator. Catches subtle mismatches like schema rating vs. displayed rating, incomplete Organization schema, and missing breadcrumb data.
AI Citeability
25%Will AI systems quote your content? We analyze quotable sentences, self-contained paragraphs, statistics with sources, entity clarity, answer-first architecture, and extractability.
Red Team Risk
QualitativeWhat could go wrong? We flag YMYL risks, hallucination traps, misleading claims, and content that AI might refuse to cite for safety reasons.
Issue Severity Levels
| Level | Meaning | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Blocker | Page cannot be indexed or cited at all | robots.txt blocks crawlers |
| High | Significantly reduces search visibility | No author attribution on YMYL content |
| Medium | Missed optimization opportunity | Missing FAQ schema markup |
| Low | Minor improvement possible | Meta description could be more specific |
Fix Effort Estimates
Every recommendation includes an effort estimate so you can prioritize effectively with S/M/L sizing.